Hi all
I need advice on the best way to deal with a recurring problem. I'm sure I'm not thinking about it properly!
I have to produce a list of our most profitable clients each month.
The data is extracted from our back office software. Unlike our previous back office software, the new kit does not have a way to relate client records together as families, or say Pension Trusts with their Trustees, etc.
So in some cases I have Mr Smith, Mrs Smith, little Bobby Smith Jr. and the Smith Family Trust, and as far as the humans who want the report are concerned, they are the 'same thing'. Sadly the software thinks they are very much different things.
On the other hand, I have many Jones's, not all of whom are related.
I can use Group within my pivot table to associate the disparate Smith data, but I can't work out how to separate the Jones's.
The data is extracted fresh each month so although I know that going into my data and changing it is an option, I'd like to be able to build something I can plumb my raw data into that will do the trick, because it's a terrible faff.
Here's a snip of my pivot table showing two groups I've created, and a bunch of Coopers I have to split into two separate Cooper families:

I might be approaching the whole thing the wrong way, I'm not wedded to using a pivot table I'll do whatever works.
There's probably 100 or so of these cases. I may just have to bite it and build a big lookup table.
Thanks in advance for any advice!
I need advice on the best way to deal with a recurring problem. I'm sure I'm not thinking about it properly!
I have to produce a list of our most profitable clients each month.
The data is extracted from our back office software. Unlike our previous back office software, the new kit does not have a way to relate client records together as families, or say Pension Trusts with their Trustees, etc.
So in some cases I have Mr Smith, Mrs Smith, little Bobby Smith Jr. and the Smith Family Trust, and as far as the humans who want the report are concerned, they are the 'same thing'. Sadly the software thinks they are very much different things.
On the other hand, I have many Jones's, not all of whom are related.
I can use Group within my pivot table to associate the disparate Smith data, but I can't work out how to separate the Jones's.
The data is extracted fresh each month so although I know that going into my data and changing it is an option, I'd like to be able to build something I can plumb my raw data into that will do the trick, because it's a terrible faff.
Here's a snip of my pivot table showing two groups I've created, and a bunch of Coopers I have to split into two separate Cooper families:

I might be approaching the whole thing the wrong way, I'm not wedded to using a pivot table I'll do whatever works.
There's probably 100 or so of these cases. I may just have to bite it and build a big lookup table.
Thanks in advance for any advice!